Converse.js vs Dendrite Lite

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureConverse.jsDendrite Lite
CategoryMatrix & XMPPMatrix & XMPP
LicenseMPL-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageJavaScriptGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 3,285★ 955
First released20132017
ReplacesSlackSlack, Discord

Why pick each one

Choose Converse.js if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.3k GitHub stars)
Converse.js details

Choose Dendrite Lite if…

  • Lighter than Synapse
  • Open standard protocol
Dendrite Lite details

Frequently asked questions

Is Converse.js or Dendrite Lite better?

Converse.js is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Dendrite Lite if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Converse.js and Dendrite Lite free and open-source?

Yes. Converse.js is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Dendrite Lite under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Converse.js and Dendrite Lite with Docker?

Converse.js: yes. Dendrite Lite: yes.

Related comparisons