Continue vs Tabby
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Continue
Open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains
VS
Tabby
Self-hosted AI coding assistant alternative to Copilot
| Feature | Continue | Tabby |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Local LLM Runners | Self-Hosted AI |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 8,192 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 35,374 | ★ 33,822 |
| First released | 2023 | 2023 |
| Replaces | GitHub Copilot, Cursor | GitHub Copilot |
Why pick each one
Choose Continue if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 35.4k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Choose Tabby if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 33.8k GitHub stars
- Written in Rust
Frequently asked questions
Is Continue or Tabby better?
Continue is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Tabby if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Continue and Tabby free and open-source?
Yes. Continue is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Tabby under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Continue and Tabby with Docker?
Continue: check the project docs for container support. Tabby: yes.