Continue vs GPT4All
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted local llm runners options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Continue
Open-source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains
VS
GPT4All
Privacy-first desktop chat with local language models
| Feature | Continue | GPT4All |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Local LLM Runners | Local LLM Runners |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 8,192 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 35,374 | ★ 77,412 |
| First released | 2023 | 2023 |
| Replaces | GitHub Copilot, Cursor | ChatGPT |
Why pick each one
Choose Continue if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 35.4k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Choose GPT4All if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 77.4k GitHub stars
- Written in C++
Frequently asked questions
Is Continue or GPT4All better?
Neither is universally better. GPT4All has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Continue and GPT4All free and open-source?
Yes. Continue is licensed under Apache-2.0 and GPT4All under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Continue and GPT4All with Docker?
Continue: check the project docs for container support. GPT4All: check the project docs for container support.