conduwuit vs Openfire
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
conduwuit
Well-maintained fork of the Conduit Matrix homeserver
VS
Openfire
Real-time collaboration XMPP server written in Java
| Feature | conduwuit | Openfire |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Matrix & XMPP |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Rust | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker, bare-metal, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 24 | ★ 3,052 |
| First released | 2024 | 2004 |
| Replaces | Slack, Discord | Slack, Microsoft Teams |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is conduwuit or Openfire better?
Neither is universally better. Openfire has the larger community, while conduwuit is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are conduwuit and Openfire free and open-source?
Yes. conduwuit is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Openfire under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run conduwuit and Openfire with Docker?
conduwuit: yes. Openfire: yes.