Concourse CI vs Jenkins
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted ci/cd & build options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Concourse CI
Pipeline-based continuous thing-doer
VS
Jenkins
Extensible open-source automation server for CI/CD
| Feature | Concourse CI | Jenkins |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CI/CD & Build | CI/CD & Build |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | docker, bare-metal, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,878 | ★ 26,434 |
| First released | 2014 | 2011 |
| Replaces | Jenkins, CircleCI | CircleCI |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Concourse CI or Jenkins better?
Jenkins is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Concourse CI if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Concourse CI and Jenkins free and open-source?
Yes. Concourse CI is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Jenkins under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Concourse CI and Jenkins with Docker?
Concourse CI: yes. Jenkins: yes.