Jitsi Videobridge vs Galène
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Jitsi Videobridge
Scalable WebRTC-compatible video routing engine
VS
Galène
Lightweight videoconferencing server
| Feature | Jitsi Videobridge | Galène |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Conferencing | Chat & Communication |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Kotlin | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,093 | ★ 1,372 |
| First released | 2013 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Zoom, Twilio | Zoom, Google Meet |
Why pick each one
Choose Jitsi Videobridge if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.1k GitHub stars)
- Written in Kotlin
Frequently asked questions
Is Jitsi Videobridge or Galène better?
Neither is universally better. Jitsi Videobridge has the larger community, while Galène is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Jitsi Videobridge and Galène free and open-source?
Yes. Jitsi Videobridge is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Galène under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Jitsi Videobridge and Galène with Docker?
Jitsi Videobridge: yes. Galène: yes.