Comm vs SimpleX Chat
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Comm
E2E-encrypted personal-server messaging app
VS
SimpleX Chat
Private messenger without any user identifiers
| Feature | Comm | SimpleX Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Haskell |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 331 | ★ 19,211 |
| First released | 2022 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Discord, Slack | Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram |
Why pick each one
Choose Comm if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Comm or SimpleX Chat better?
SimpleX Chat is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Comm if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Comm and SimpleX Chat free and open-source?
Yes. Comm is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and SimpleX Chat under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Comm and SimpleX Chat with Docker?
Comm: yes. SimpleX Chat: yes.