Centrifugo vs Comm
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Centrifugo
Scalable real-time messaging server for apps and websites
VS
Comm
E2E-encrypted personal-server messaging app
| Feature | Centrifugo | Comm |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,590 | ★ 331 |
| First released | 2015 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Pusher, Firebase Realtime Database | Discord, Slack |
Why pick each one
Choose Comm if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Centrifugo or Comm better?
Centrifugo is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Comm if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Centrifugo and Comm free and open-source?
Yes. Centrifugo is licensed under MIT and Comm under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Centrifugo and Comm with Docker?
Centrifugo: yes. Comm: yes.