collectd vs Telegraf
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
collectd
Lightweight system statistics collection daemon
VS
Telegraf
Plugin-driven server agent for collecting metrics
| Feature | collectd | Telegraf |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | C | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, binary | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,366 | ★ 17,736 |
| First released | 2005 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Datadog Agent | Datadog Agent |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is collectd or Telegraf better?
Telegraf is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider collectd if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are collectd and Telegraf free and open-source?
Yes. collectd is licensed under MIT and Telegraf under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run collectd and Telegraf with Docker?
collectd: check the project docs for container support. Telegraf: yes.