Penpot vs LazySQL

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePenpotLazySQL
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseMPL-2.0MIT
LanguageClojureGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM2,048 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetesbinary, source
GitHub stars★ 58,249★ 4,190
First released20202023
ReplacesFigmaDBeaver, TablePlus

Why pick each one

Choose Penpot if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 58.2k GitHub stars
Penpot details

Choose LazySQL if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (4.2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Go
LazySQL details

Frequently asked questions

Is Penpot or LazySQL better?

Neither is universally better. Penpot has the larger community, while LazySQL is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Penpot and LazySQL free and open-source?

Yes. Penpot is licensed under MPL-2.0 and LazySQL under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Penpot and LazySQL with Docker?

Penpot: yes. LazySQL: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons