Penpot vs Infracost

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePenpotInfracost
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseMPL-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageClojureGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM2,048 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetesbinary, docker
GitHub stars★ 58,249★ 12,442
First released20202020
ReplacesFigmaCloudHealth

Why pick each one

Choose Penpot if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 58.2k GitHub stars
Penpot details

Choose Infracost if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 12.4k GitHub stars
Infracost details

Frequently asked questions

Is Penpot or Infracost better?

Neither is universally better. Penpot has the larger community, while Infracost is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Penpot and Infracost free and open-source?

Yes. Penpot is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Infracost under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Penpot and Infracost with Docker?

Penpot: yes. Infracost: yes.

Related comparisons