SHSelfHostIndex

CMaNGOS vs Retroarch Web Player

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game engines & frameworks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
CM CMaNGOS Continued MaNGOS World of Warcraft server emulator VS RE Retroarch Web Player Emulate videogames system and play videogames through your web browser
FeatureCMaNGOSRetroarch Web Player
CategoryGame Engines & FrameworksGame Engines & Frameworks
LicenseGPL-2.0GPL-3.0-or-later
LanguageC++C
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM4,096 MB50 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 550★ 13,480
First released20132023
Replacesofficial WoW servers—

Why pick each one

Choose CMaNGOS if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Written in C++
CMaNGOS details

Choose Retroarch Web Player if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0-or-later license
  • Mature project with 13.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in C
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Retroarch Web Player details

Frequently asked questions

Is CMaNGOS or Retroarch Web Player better?

Retroarch Web Player is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider CMaNGOS if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are CMaNGOS and Retroarch Web Player free and open-source?

Yes. CMaNGOS is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Retroarch Web Player under GPL-3.0-or-later. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run CMaNGOS and Retroarch Web Player with Docker?

CMaNGOS: check the project docs for container support. Retroarch Web Player: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons