Claper vs hitobito
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted calendar & contacts options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Claper
The ultimate tool to interact with your audience (alternative to
VS
hitobito
Manage complex group hierarchies with members, events and a lot more
| Feature | Claper | hitobito |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Calendar & Contacts | Calendar & Contacts |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Elixir | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 773 | ★ 475 |
| First released | 2026 | 2026 |
| Replaces | — | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Claper if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Elixir
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose hitobito if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Written in Ruby
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Claper or hitobito better?
Neither is universally better. Claper has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Claper and hitobito free and open-source?
Yes. Claper is licensed under GPL-3.0 and hitobito under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Claper and hitobito with Docker?
Claper: yes. hitobito: check the project docs for container support.