CKAN vs Deja Dup

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCKANDeja Dup
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguagePythonVala
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbinary
GitHub stars★ 5,088★ 600
First released20262008
ReplacesTime Machine, Backblaze

Why pick each one

Choose CKAN if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 5.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
CKAN details

Choose Deja Dup if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Vala
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Deja Dup details

Frequently asked questions

Is CKAN or Deja Dup better?

Neither is universally better. CKAN has the larger community, while Deja Dup is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are CKAN and Deja Dup free and open-source?

Yes. CKAN is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Deja Dup under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run CKAN and Deja Dup with Docker?

CKAN: check the project docs for container support. Deja Dup: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons