CKAN vs Duplicati

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCKANDuplicati
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguagePythonC#
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 5,088★ 14,864
First released20262008
ReplacesBackblaze, Carbonite

Why pick each one

Choose CKAN if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 5.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
CKAN details

Choose Duplicati if…

  • Friendly GUI
  • Broad storage support
  • Free
Duplicati details

Frequently asked questions

Is CKAN or Duplicati better?

Duplicati is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider CKAN if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are CKAN and Duplicati free and open-source?

Yes. CKAN is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Duplicati under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run CKAN and Duplicati with Docker?

CKAN: check the project docs for container support. Duplicati: yes.

Related comparisons