Chisel vs FreeRDP
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Chisel
Fast TCP/UDP tunnel over HTTP secured by SSH
VS
FreeRDP
Free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol
| Feature | Chisel | FreeRDP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | C |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 16,362 | ★ 13,527 |
| First released | 2015 | 2009 |
| Replaces | ngrok | Microsoft RDP |
Why pick each one
Choose Chisel if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 16.4k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Chisel or FreeRDP better?
Neither is universally better. Chisel has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Chisel and FreeRDP free and open-source?
Yes. Chisel is licensed under MIT and FreeRDP under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Chisel and FreeRDP with Docker?
Chisel: yes. FreeRDP: check the project docs for container support.