Apereo CAS vs LLDAP
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Apereo CAS
Enterprise single sign-on server for web applications
VS
LLDAP
Lightweight LDAP server with a simple web interface
| Feature | Apereo CAS | LLDAP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Java | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 11,354 | ★ 6,421 |
| First released | 2004 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Okta, Ping Identity | Active Directory, OpenLDAP |
Why pick each one
Choose Apereo CAS if…
- Mature SSO with broad protocol support
- Widely adopted in academia
Frequently asked questions
Is Apereo CAS or LLDAP better?
Neither is universally better. Apereo CAS has the larger community, while LLDAP is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Apereo CAS and LLDAP free and open-source?
Yes. Apereo CAS is licensed under Apache-2.0 and LLDAP under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Apereo CAS and LLDAP with Docker?
Apereo CAS: yes. LLDAP: yes.