Boundary vs LLDAP
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Boundary
Identity-based secure access to systems and services
VS
LLDAP
Lightweight LDAP server with a simple web interface
| Feature | Boundary | LLDAP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | BUSL-1.1 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,055 | ★ 6,421 |
| First released | 2020 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Teleport, StrongDM | Active Directory, OpenLDAP |
Why pick each one
Choose Boundary if…
- Released under the BUSL-1.1 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (4.1k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Boundary or LLDAP better?
LLDAP is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Boundary if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Boundary and LLDAP free and open-source?
Yes. Boundary is licensed under BUSL-1.1 and LLDAP under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Boundary and LLDAP with Docker?
Boundary: yes. LLDAP: yes.