camera-streamer vs OpenALPR

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featurecamera-streamerOpenALPR
CategoryVideo SurveillanceVideo Surveillance
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageCC++
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM128 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 442★ 11,440
First released20222015
Replacesmjpg-streamerRekor Scout, Plate Recognizer

Why pick each one

Choose camera-streamer if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in C
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
camera-streamer details

Choose OpenALPR if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 11.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
OpenALPR details

Frequently asked questions

Is camera-streamer or OpenALPR better?

Neither is universally better. OpenALPR has the larger community, while camera-streamer is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are camera-streamer and OpenALPR free and open-source?

Yes. camera-streamer is licensed under MIT and OpenALPR under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run camera-streamer and OpenALPR with Docker?

camera-streamer: yes. OpenALPR: yes.

Related comparisons