SHSelfHostIndex

Caddy vs Zoraxy

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
CA Caddy Fast, multi-platform web server with automatic HTTPS VS ZO Zoraxy General-purpose HTTP reverse proxy and forwarding tool
FeatureCaddyZoraxy
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoHTML
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, bare-metaldocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 74,748★ 5,370
First released20152022
ReplacesNginx, ApacheNginx Proxy Manager

Why pick each one

Choose Caddy if…

  • Zero-config TLS
  • Easy to learn
Caddy details

Choose Zoraxy if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 5.4k GitHub stars
Zoraxy details

Frequently asked questions

Is Caddy or Zoraxy better?

Neither is universally better. Caddy has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Caddy and Zoraxy free and open-source?

Yes. Caddy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Zoraxy under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Caddy and Zoraxy with Docker?

Caddy: yes. Zoraxy: yes.

Related comparisons