Caddy vs sish
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Caddy
Fast, multi-platform web server with automatic HTTPS
VS
sish
HTTP(S)/WS(S)/TCP tunnels to localhost using only SSH (serveo/ngrok
| Feature | Caddy | sish |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 74,748 | ★ 4,690 |
| First released | 2015 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Nginx, Apache | — |
Why pick each one
Choose sish if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (4.7k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Caddy or sish better?
Caddy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider sish if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Caddy and sish free and open-source?
Yes. Caddy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and sish under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Caddy and sish with Docker?
Caddy: yes. sish: yes.