Caddy vs OAuth2 Proxy
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Caddy
Fast, multi-platform web server with automatic HTTPS
VS
OAuth2 Proxy
Reverse proxy that adds authentication to any web app
| Feature | Caddy | OAuth2 Proxy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 74,748 | ★ 14,808 |
| First released | 2015 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Nginx, Apache | Cloudflare Access |
Why pick each one
Choose OAuth2 Proxy if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 14.8k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Caddy or OAuth2 Proxy better?
Caddy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider OAuth2 Proxy if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Caddy and OAuth2 Proxy free and open-source?
Yes. Caddy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and OAuth2 Proxy under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Caddy and OAuth2 Proxy with Docker?
Caddy: yes. OAuth2 Proxy: yes.