Caddy vs imgproxy
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Caddy
Fast, multi-platform web server with automatic HTTPS
VS
imgproxy
Fast and secure standalone server for resizing and converting remote
| Feature | Caddy | imgproxy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, bare-metal | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 74,748 | ★ 10,997 |
| First released | 2015 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Nginx, Apache | — |
Why pick each one
Choose imgproxy if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 11k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Caddy or imgproxy better?
Caddy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider imgproxy if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Caddy and imgproxy free and open-source?
Yes. Caddy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and imgproxy under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Caddy and imgproxy with Docker?
Caddy: yes. imgproxy: yes.