Caddy Security vs Tinyauth
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Caddy Security
Authentication and authorization plugin for Caddy
VS
Tinyauth
Simplest way to protect your apps with a login screen
| Feature | Caddy Security | Tinyauth |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,213 | ★ 8,092 |
| First released | 2021 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Cloudflare Access | Cloudflare Access |
Why pick each one
Choose Caddy Security if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Active community (2.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Choose Tinyauth if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 8.1k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Caddy Security or Tinyauth better?
Tinyauth is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Caddy Security if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Caddy Security and Tinyauth free and open-source?
Yes. Caddy Security is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Tinyauth under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Caddy Security and Tinyauth with Docker?
Caddy Security: check the project docs for container support. Tinyauth: yes.