Caddy Security vs SuperTokens
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Caddy Security
Authentication and authorization plugin for Caddy
VS
SuperTokens
Open-source user authentication you can self-host
| Feature | Caddy Security | SuperTokens |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,213 | ★ 15,250 |
| First released | 2021 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Cloudflare Access | Auth0, Firebase Auth |
Why pick each one
Choose Caddy Security if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Active community (2.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Caddy Security or SuperTokens better?
Neither is universally better. SuperTokens has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Caddy Security and SuperTokens free and open-source?
Yes. Caddy Security is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SuperTokens under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Caddy Security and SuperTokens with Docker?
Caddy Security: check the project docs for container support. SuperTokens: yes.