Buttercup vs Psono Client
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Buttercup
Cross-platform password manager with multiple storage backends
VS
Psono Client
Browser and web client for the Psono password server
| Feature | Buttercup | Psono Client |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Password Managers | Password Managers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,394 | ★ 26 |
| First released | 2015 | 2017 |
| Replaces | 1Password, LastPass | LastPass, 1Password |
Why pick each one
Choose Psono Client if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Buttercup or Psono Client better?
Buttercup is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Psono Client if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Buttercup and Psono Client free and open-source?
Yes. Buttercup is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Psono Client under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Buttercup and Psono Client with Docker?
Buttercup: check the project docs for container support. Psono Client: yes.