Burp vs HashBackup
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Burp
Network backup and restore program for Unix and Windows
VS
HashBackup
Efficient command-line backup with deduplication
| Feature | Burp | HashBackup |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | C | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 504 | ★ 1 |
| First released | 2011 | 2009 |
| Replaces | CrashPlan | CrashPlan |
Why pick each one
Choose Burp if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose HashBackup if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Burp or HashBackup better?
Neither is universally better. Burp has the larger community, while HashBackup is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Burp and HashBackup free and open-source?
Yes. Burp is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and HashBackup under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Burp and HashBackup with Docker?
Burp: check the project docs for container support. HashBackup: check the project docs for container support.