bup vs Yuno Archive
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
bup
Efficient backup system based on the git packfile format
VS
Yuno Archive
Extend functionnality of built-in yunoHost backup system
| Feature | bup | Yuno Archive |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | LGPL-2.1 | AGPL-3.0-only |
| Language | Python | Shell |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | binary | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,337 | ★ 6 |
| First released | 2010 | 2025 |
| Replaces | Time Machine | archivist, borg |
Why pick each one
Choose bup if…
- Released under the LGPL-2.1 license
- Mature project with 7.3k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Choose Yuno Archive if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0-only license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Shell
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is bup or Yuno Archive better?
Neither is universally better. bup has the larger community, while Yuno Archive is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are bup and Yuno Archive free and open-source?
Yes. bup is licensed under LGPL-2.1 and Yuno Archive under AGPL-3.0-only. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run bup and Yuno Archive with Docker?
bup: check the project docs for container support. Yuno Archive: check the project docs for container support.