bup vs Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
bup
Efficient backup system based on the git packfile format
VS
Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup
Time Machine-style backups for Linux and macOS using rsync
| Feature | bup | Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | LGPL-2.1 | MIT |
| Language | Python | Shell |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | binary | binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,337 | ★ 3,608 |
| First released | 2010 | 2014 |
| Replaces | Time Machine | Time Machine |
Why pick each one
Choose bup if…
- Released under the LGPL-2.1 license
- Mature project with 7.3k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Choose Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (3.6k GitHub stars)
- Written in Shell
Frequently asked questions
Is bup or Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup better?
Neither is universally better. bup has the larger community, while Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are bup and Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup free and open-source?
Yes. bup is licensed under LGPL-2.1 and Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run bup and Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup with Docker?
bup: check the project docs for container support. Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup: check the project docs for container support.