Black Candy vs Polaris

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBlack CandyPolaris
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupUnder-an-hour setup
Health score89 · Excellent75 · Good
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageRubyRust
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, binary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 4,418★ 2,731
First releasedNone2017
ReplacesSpotify, Apple MusicSpotify

What are Black Candy and Polaris?

Black Candy

A self hosted music streaming server. Contribute to blackcandy-org/blackcandy development by creating an account on GitHub.

  • Personal music streaming
  • Responsive web player
  • Multi-user accounts
  • PWA support

Read the full Black Candy guide →

Polaris

Polaris is a self-hosted music streaming application written in Rust, designed to be fast and easy to set up. It lets you browse and stream your music collection from a clean web interface or compatible clients.

  • Written in Rust for speed
  • Simple setup
  • Last.fm integration
  • Collection browsing

Read the full Polaris guide →

Black Candy vs Polaris: key differences

Black Candy is written in Ruby, while Polaris is built with Rust. Polaris is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 512 MB for Black Candy.

Why pick each one

Choose Black Candy if…

  • Clean modern interface
  • Simple to deploy

Watch out for

  • Music only
  • Smaller ecosystem
Black Candy details

Choose Polaris if…

  • Low resource usage
  • Single binary deployment

Watch out for

  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Fewer client options
Polaris details

Frequently asked questions

Is Black Candy or Polaris better?

Neither is universally better. Black Candy has the larger community, while Polaris is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Black Candy and Polaris free and open-source?

Yes. Black Candy is licensed under MIT and Polaris under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Black Candy and Polaris with Docker?

Black Candy: yes. Polaris: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, Black Candy or Polaris?

Polaris has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for Black Candy. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons