Beehive vs Huginn
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Beehive
Event and agent system for connecting things
VS
Huginn
Agents that monitor and act on your behalf
| Feature | Beehive | Huginn |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 6,485 | ★ 49,759 |
| First released | 2015 | 2013 |
| Replaces | IFTTT | IFTTT, Zapier |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Beehive or Huginn better?
Neither is universally better. Huginn has the larger community, while Beehive is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Beehive and Huginn free and open-source?
Yes. Beehive is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Huginn under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Beehive and Huginn with Docker?
Beehive: yes. Huginn: yes.