Bamboo vs Laminar
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted ci/cd & build options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Bamboo
Continuous integration server
VS
Laminar
Lightweight and modular continuous integration service
| Feature | Bamboo | Laminar |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CI/CD & Build | CI/CD & Build |
| License | ⊘ Proprietary | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Java | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | — | ★ 352 |
| First released | 2020 | 2016 |
| Replaces | — | Jenkins |
Why pick each one
Choose Bamboo if…
- Released under the ⊘ Proprietary license
- Written in Java
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Laminar if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Written in C++
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Bamboo or Laminar better?
Neither is universally better. Laminar has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Bamboo and Laminar free and open-source?
Yes. Bamboo is licensed under ⊘ Proprietary and Laminar under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Bamboo and Laminar with Docker?
Bamboo: check the project docs for container support. Laminar: check the project docs for container support.