Argo CD vs Laminar
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted ci/cd & build options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Argo CD
Declarative GitOps continuous delivery for Kubernetes
VS
Laminar
Lightweight and modular continuous integration service
| Feature | Argo CD | Laminar |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CI/CD & Build | CI/CD & Build |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | kubernetes, helm | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 23,867 | ★ 352 |
| First released | 2018 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Spinnaker | Jenkins |
Why pick each one
Choose Argo CD if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 23.9k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Choose Laminar if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Written in C++
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Argo CD or Laminar better?
Neither is universally better. Argo CD has the larger community, while Laminar is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Argo CD and Laminar free and open-source?
Yes. Argo CD is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Laminar under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Argo CD and Laminar with Docker?
Argo CD: check the project docs for container support. Laminar: check the project docs for container support.