BackupPC vs Minarca
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
BackupPC
High-performance backup system for PCs and servers
VS
Minarca
Cross-platform backup software with a central server
| Feature | BackupPC | Minarca |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Perl | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, docker | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,621 | ★ 100 |
| First released | 2001 | 2015 |
| Replaces | CrashPlan, Time Machine | CrashPlan |
Why pick each one
Choose BackupPC if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
- Written in Perl
Choose Minarca if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is BackupPC or Minarca better?
Neither is universally better. BackupPC has the larger community, while Minarca is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are BackupPC and Minarca free and open-source?
Yes. BackupPC is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Minarca under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run BackupPC and Minarca with Docker?
BackupPC: yes. Minarca: yes.