SHSelfHostIndex

Actions Runner Controller vs Novu

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
AC Actions Runner Controller Run self-hosted GitHub Actions runners on Kubernetes VS NO Novu Open-source notification infrastructure for developers
FeatureActions Runner ControllerNovu
CategoryAutomation & WorkflowsAutomation & Workflows
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM512 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentkubernetes, helmdocker, kubernetes
GitHub stars★ 6,422★ 39,466
First released20202021
ReplacesGitHub-hosted runnersCourier, Knock

Why pick each one

Choose Actions Runner Controller if…

  • Elastic CI capacity
  • Keeps builds in your cluster
Actions Runner Controller details

Choose Novu if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 39.5k GitHub stars
Novu details

Frequently asked questions

Is Actions Runner Controller or Novu better?

Novu is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Actions Runner Controller if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Actions Runner Controller and Novu free and open-source?

Yes. Actions Runner Controller is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Novu under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Actions Runner Controller and Novu with Docker?

Actions Runner Controller: check the project docs for container support. Novu: yes.

Related comparisons