Crontab UI vs Chadburn
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Crontab UI
Web interface for editing and managing crontab jobs
VS
Chadburn
Job scheduler for Docker environments using container labels
| Feature | Crontab UI | Chadburn |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,277 | ★ 79 |
| First released | 2016 | 2021 |
| Replaces | cron | cron |
Why pick each one
Choose Chadburn if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Crontab UI or Chadburn better?
Neither is universally better. Crontab UI has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Crontab UI and Chadburn free and open-source?
Yes. Crontab UI is licensed under MIT and Chadburn under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Crontab UI and Chadburn with Docker?
Crontab UI: yes. Chadburn: yes.