Automad vs WordPress
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Automad
Flat-file CMS and template engine in one
VS
WordPress
The most popular content management system in the world
| Feature | Automad | WordPress |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, one-click |
| GitHub stars | ★ 926 | ★ 21,316 |
| First released | 2014 | 2003 |
| Replaces | WordPress | Wix, Squarespace, WordPress.com |
Why pick each one
Choose WordPress if…
- Unmatched ecosystem and documentation
- Easy for non-technical users
Frequently asked questions
Is Automad or WordPress better?
Neither is universally better. WordPress has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Automad and WordPress free and open-source?
Yes. Automad is licensed under MIT and WordPress under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Automad and WordPress with Docker?
Automad: yes. WordPress: yes.