autobrr vs Automa
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
autobrr
Automation tool for filtering and processing release feeds
VS
Automa
Browser automation via drag-and-drop visual workflows
| Feature | autobrr | Automa |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Vue |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,934 | ★ 21,543 |
| First released | 2021 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Zapier | Zapier, UiPath |
Why pick each one
Choose autobrr if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.9k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Choose Automa if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 21.5k GitHub stars
- Written in Vue
Frequently asked questions
Is autobrr or Automa better?
Automa is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider autobrr if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are autobrr and Automa free and open-source?
Yes. autobrr is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Automa under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run autobrr and Automa with Docker?
autobrr: yes. Automa: check the project docs for container support.