authentik vs Caddy

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureauthentikCaddy
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguagePythonGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM1,024 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker, binary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 23,666★ 74,748
First released20202015
ReplacesOkta, Auth0Nginx, Apache

Why pick each one

Choose authentik if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 23.7k GitHub stars
authentik details

Choose Caddy if…

  • Zero-config TLS
  • Easy to learn
Caddy details

Frequently asked questions

Is authentik or Caddy better?

Caddy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider authentik if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are authentik and Caddy free and open-source?

Yes. authentik is licensed under MIT and Caddy under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run authentik and Caddy with Docker?

authentik: yes. Caddy: yes.

Related comparisons