Astro vs Orchid
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted blogging platforms options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Astro
Modern static site framework for content-driven sites
VS
Orchid
Static site generator for documentation and blogs on the JVM
| Feature | Astro | Orchid |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Blogging Platforms |
| License | MIT | LGPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Kotlin |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 61,631 | ★ 529 |
| First released | 2021 | 2017 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Medium | Jekyll, GitBook |
Why pick each one
Choose Orchid if…
- Released under the LGPL-3.0 license
- Written in Kotlin
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Astro or Orchid better?
Neither is universally better. Astro has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Astro and Orchid free and open-source?
Yes. Astro is licensed under MIT and Orchid under LGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Astro and Orchid with Docker?
Astro: check the project docs for container support. Orchid: check the project docs for container support.