AssaultCube vs OpenRCT2

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureAssaultCubeOpenRCT2
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseZlibGPL-3.0
LanguageCC++
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcebare-metal, binary, source
GitHub stars★ 1,029★ 16,049
First released20062014
ReplacesCounter-StrikeRollerCoaster Tycoon

Why pick each one

Choose AssaultCube if…

  • Released under the Zlib license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (1k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C
AssaultCube details

Choose OpenRCT2 if…

  • Faithful modern remake
  • Active community
OpenRCT2 details

Frequently asked questions

Is AssaultCube or OpenRCT2 better?

Neither is universally better. OpenRCT2 has the larger community, while AssaultCube is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are AssaultCube and OpenRCT2 free and open-source?

Yes. AssaultCube is licensed under Zlib and OpenRCT2 under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run AssaultCube and OpenRCT2 with Docker?

AssaultCube: check the project docs for container support. OpenRCT2: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons