ArchiveBox vs TriliumNext Notes
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
ArchiveBox
Self-hosted web archiving from bookmarks and feeds
VS
TriliumNext Notes
Cross-platform hierarchical note taking application with focus on
| Feature | ArchiveBox | TriliumNext Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later | Notes & Knowledge Base |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 28,079 | ★ 37,298 |
| First released | 2017 | 2026 |
| Replaces | — |
Why pick each one
Choose ArchiveBox if…
- Thorough page preservation
- Imports from many sources
- Open formats
Choose TriliumNext Notes if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 37.3k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is ArchiveBox or TriliumNext Notes better?
Neither is universally better. TriliumNext Notes has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are ArchiveBox and TriliumNext Notes free and open-source?
Yes. ArchiveBox is licensed under MIT and TriliumNext Notes under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run ArchiveBox and TriliumNext Notes with Docker?
ArchiveBox: yes. TriliumNext Notes: yes.