ArchiveBox vs Trilium Notes
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
ArchiveBox
Self-hosted web archiving from bookmarks and feeds
VS
Trilium Notes
Hierarchical note-taking for building knowledge bases
| Feature | ArchiveBox | Trilium Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later | Notes & Knowledge Base |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 28,079 | ★ 37,298 |
| First released | 2017 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Evernote, Notion |
Why pick each one
Choose ArchiveBox if…
- Thorough page preservation
- Imports from many sources
- Open formats
Choose Trilium Notes if…
- Powerful for big knowledge bases
- Flexible structure
- Scriptable
Frequently asked questions
Is ArchiveBox or Trilium Notes better?
Trilium Notes is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider ArchiveBox if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are ArchiveBox and Trilium Notes free and open-source?
Yes. ArchiveBox is licensed under MIT and Trilium Notes under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run ArchiveBox and Trilium Notes with Docker?
ArchiveBox: yes. Trilium Notes: yes.