Antora vs zk
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted wikis & documentation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Antora
Multi-repository documentation site generator
VS
zk
Plain-text note-taking and Zettelkasten assistant
| Feature | Antora | zk |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Wikis & Documentation | Wikis & Documentation |
| License | MPL-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 800 | ★ 2,748 |
| First released | 2017 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Confluence, GitBook | Roam Research, Obsidian |
Why pick each one
Choose zk if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (2.7k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Antora or zk better?
zk is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Antora if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Antora and zk free and open-source?
Yes. Antora is licensed under MPL-2.0 and zk under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Antora and zk with Docker?
Antora: check the project docs for container support. zk: check the project docs for container support.