Antora vs Zim
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted wikis & documentation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Antora
Multi-repository documentation site generator
VS
Zim
A desktop wiki and personal knowledge base
| Feature | Antora | Zim |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Wikis & Documentation | Wikis & Documentation |
| License | MPL-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 800 | ★ 2,194 |
| First released | 2017 | 2008 |
| Replaces | Confluence, GitBook | OneNote, Notion |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Antora or Zim better?
Zim is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Antora if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Antora and Zim free and open-source?
Yes. Antora is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Zim under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Antora and Zim with Docker?
Antora: check the project docs for container support. Zim: check the project docs for container support.