Antora vs Gitit
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted wikis & documentation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Antora
Multi-repository documentation site generator
VS
Gitit
Wiki program that stores pages and uploaded files in a git repository,
| Feature | Antora | Gitit |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Wikis & Documentation | Wikis & Documentation |
| License | MPL-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Haskell |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 800 | ★ 2,279 |
| First released | 2017 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Confluence, GitBook | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Gitit if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Active community (2.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in Haskell
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Antora or Gitit better?
Neither is universally better. Gitit has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Antora and Gitit free and open-source?
Yes. Antora is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Gitit under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Antora and Gitit with Docker?
Antora: check the project docs for container support. Gitit: check the project docs for container support.