Friendiqa Hub vs nanogallery2
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Friendiqa Hub
Federated photo gallery and social timeline
VS
nanogallery2
JavaScript photo and video gallery library you host yourself
| Feature | Friendiqa Hub | nanogallery2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Social Networks | Photo Management |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 130 | ★ 791 |
| First released | 2019 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Instagram, Flickr | Flickr, SmugMug |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Friendiqa Hub or nanogallery2 better?
nanogallery2 is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Friendiqa Hub if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Friendiqa Hub and nanogallery2 free and open-source?
Yes. Friendiqa Hub is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and nanogallery2 under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Friendiqa Hub and nanogallery2 with Docker?
Friendiqa Hub: yes. nanogallery2: check the project docs for container support.