Amplication vs Lowdefy
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Amplication
Code generation platform for production-ready backends
VS
Lowdefy
Build internal tools and web apps from YAML config
| Feature | Amplication | Lowdefy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools & Git | Developer Tools & Git |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 16,016 | ★ 2,996 |
| First released | 2020 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Retool, Hasura | Retool, Appsmith |
Why pick each one
Choose Amplication if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 16k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Choose Lowdefy if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Amplication or Lowdefy better?
Neither is universally better. Amplication has the larger community, while Lowdefy is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Amplication and Lowdefy free and open-source?
Yes. Amplication is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Lowdefy under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Amplication and Lowdefy with Docker?
Amplication: yes. Lowdefy: yes.