Akaunting vs Beancount

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted budgeting & finance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureAkauntingBeancount
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupRead-the-docs project
Health score93 · Excellent88 · Excellent
CategoryBudgeting & FinanceBudgeting & Finance
LicenseGPL-3.0GPL-2.0
LanguagePHPPython
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcebinary, source
GitHub stars★ 10,133★ 6,028
First released20172008
ReplacesQuickBooks, XeroQuickBooks, Xero

What are Akaunting and Beancount?

Akaunting

Akaunting is a free, open-source accounting software for small businesses and freelancers. It handles invoicing, expense tracking, bank reconciliation, and financial reporting with a modular app store.

  • Double-entry accounting
  • Invoicing and billing
  • App store for extensions
  • Multi-company support

Read the full Akaunting guide →

Beancount

Beancount is a double-entry plain-text accounting system that parses ledger files written in its own syntax. It includes a SQL-like query language and integrates with the Fava web interface.

  • Plain-text ledgers
  • SQL-like query language
  • Strict validation
  • Fava web companion

Akaunting vs Beancount: key differences

Akaunting is written in PHP, while Beancount is built with Python. Licensing differs — GPL-3.0 for Akaunting versus GPL-2.0 for Beancount. Beancount is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 512 MB for Akaunting. Beancount is the more established project (first released 2008), while Akaunting arrived in 2017. Akaunting lists first-class Docker deployment; Beancount does not.

Why pick each one

Choose Akaunting if…

  • Full accounting feature set
  • Extensible via apps

Watch out for

  • Many features are paid apps
  • Reporting could be deeper
Akaunting details

Choose Beancount if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Mature project with 6k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Beancount details

Frequently asked questions

Is Akaunting or Beancount better?

Akaunting is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Beancount if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Akaunting and Beancount free and open-source?

Yes. Akaunting is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Beancount under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Akaunting and Beancount with Docker?

Akaunting: yes. Beancount: check the project docs for container support.

Which is lighter on resources, Akaunting or Beancount?

Beancount has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for Akaunting. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons