AdGuard Home vs go-shadowsocks2
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
AdGuard Home
Network-wide DNS ad and tracker blocker
VS
go-shadowsocks2
Modern Shadowsocks proxy implementation in Go
| Feature | AdGuard Home | go-shadowsocks2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 35,977 | ★ 4,731 |
| First released | 2018 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Pi-hole, NextDNS | VPN |
Why pick each one
Choose AdGuard Home if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 36k GitHub stars
Choose go-shadowsocks2 if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (4.7k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is AdGuard Home or go-shadowsocks2 better?
AdGuard Home is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider go-shadowsocks2 if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are AdGuard Home and go-shadowsocks2 free and open-source?
Yes. AdGuard Home is licensed under GPL-3.0 and go-shadowsocks2 under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run AdGuard Home and go-shadowsocks2 with Docker?
AdGuard Home: yes. go-shadowsocks2: yes.